| Blaming
Chimps, Blacks, and Gays for AIDS
Alan
Cantwell, Jr., M.D.

Since
the beginning of the AIDS epidemic there have been persistent
rumors that the disease was man-made, and that HIV was deliberately
"introduced" into the American gay and the African
black populations as a germ warfare experiment. This so-called
conspiracy theory was quickly squelched by virologists and
molecular biologists, who blamed primates in the African bush
and human sexuality for the introduction and spread of HIV.
In the fall of
1986, the Soviets shocked the world by claiming that HIV was
secretly developed at Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army's biological
warfare unit. Although the claim was dismissed as "infectious
propaganda," Russian scientists had worked hand in hand
with biological warfare scientists in the transfer of viruses
and virus-infected tissue into various non-human primates
(monkeys, apes, chimps) during the 1970s, before AIDS appeared.
With improved international relationships, the Russian accusation
vanished.
Although evidence
supporting the man-made theory has never been mentioned in
the major U.S. media, the theory continues to be ridiculed.
For example, in the San Francisco Chronicle, ("Quest
for the Origin of AIDS," January 14, 2001), William Carlsen
writes: "In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, theories
attempting to explain the origin of the disease ranged from
the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ escaped from a secret
CIA laboratory; God sent the plague down to punish homosexuals
and drug addicts; it came from outer space, riding on the
tail of a comet."
AIDS certainly
did not come from the hand of God or from outer space. However,
there is ample evidence to suspect the hand of man in the
outbreak of AIDS that first began in the late 1970s in New
York City.
Creating
AIDS in animals before the epidemic
Lost in the history of AIDS is evidence pointing to HIV as
a virus whose origin traces back to animal cancer retrovirus
experimentation in the "pre-AIDS" years of the 1960s
and 70s. Evidence linking the introduction of HIV into gays
and blacks via vaccine experiments and programs in the late
1970s has been totally ignored in favor of the politically
correct theory claiming that HIV originated in chimpanzees
in the African rain forest, and that HIV "jumped species"
into the African population around 1930 or even earlier.
Conveniently overlooked
is the series of outbreaks of AIDS-like epidemics that broke
out in U.S. primate centers, beginning in 1969. A decade before
AIDS, the first of five recorded epidemics of "simian
AIDS" erupted in a colony of stump-tailed macaques housed
in a primate lab at Davis, California. Most of the macaques
died. Two types of primate immunodeficiency viruses were eventually
discovered as the cause. A few silently infected monkeys transferred
to the primate colony at Yerkes in Atlanta subsequently died
of simian AIDS in the late 1980s. Veterinarians claim the
origin of the simian AIDS outbreak is unknown. However, one
obvious possibility is the experimental transfer of viruses
between various primate species, which is common practice
in animal laboratories.
In 1974, veterinarians
actually created an AIDS-like disease when newborn chimps
were removed from their mothers and weaned exclusively on
virus-infected milk from cows infected with "bovine C-type
virus." Within a year the chimps died of leukemia and
pneumocystis pneumonia (the "gay pneumonia" of AIDS).
Both diseases had never been observed in chimps before this
virus-transfer experiment.
Also downplayed
is the laboratory creation of feline leukemia and "cat
AIDS" by the transfer of HIV-like cat retroviruses in
the mid-1970s. These experiments were conducted at Harvard
by Myron (Max) Essex, later to become a famous AIDS researcher.
All this man-made creation of AIDS in laboratory animals directly
preceded the "mysterious" 1979 introduction of HIV
into gay men, the most hated minority in America.
Nowadays, scientists
hunt for "ancestor" viruses of HIV in chimps in
the African wild and ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses
that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS.
No consideration is given to any of these lab viruses as possible
man-made ancestors of the many "strains" of HIV
(and HIV-2) that jumped species to produce AIDS in humans.
Gay
experiments preceding AIDS (1978-1981)
Scientists also discount any connection between the official
outbreak of AIDS in 1981 and the experimental hepatitis B
vaccine program (1978-1981) at the New York Blood Center in
Manhattan, which used gays as guinea pigs shortly before the
epidemic. Curiously, the exact origin of AIDS in the United
States remains unstudied. Health authorities simply blame
promiscuous gay men, but never adequately explain how a black
heterosexual African disease could have transformed itself
exclusively into a white young gay male disease in Manhattan.
Researchers claim
HIV incubated in Africa for more than a half century until
AIDS broke out there in 1982. However, in the U.S. there was
no incubation period for gay men. As soon as homosexuals signed
up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine
experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of unknown
origin. The hepatitis B experiments began in Manhattan in
the fall of 1978; the first few cases of AIDS (all young gays
from Manhattan) were reported to the CDC in 1979.
Scientists have
also failed to explain how a brand new herpes virus was also
introduced exclusively into gays, along with HIV, in the late
1970s. This herpes virus is now believed to be the cause of
Kaposi's sarcoma, the so-called "gay cancer" of
AIDS. Before AIDS, Kaposi's sarcoma was never seen in healthy
young men. Identified a decade after HIV, in 1994, this KS
virus is closely related to a primate cancer-causing herpes
virus extensively studied and transferred in animal laboratories
in the decade before AIDS.
Also downplayed
to the public is a new microbe (Mycoplasma penetrans), also
of unknown origin, that was introduced into homosexuals, along
with HIV and the new herpes virus. Thus, not one but three
new infectious agents were inexplicably transferred into the
gay population at the start of the epidemic - HIV, the herpes
KS virus, and M. penetrans.
In his book, Virus
[2000], Luc Montagnier (the French virologist who co-discovered
HIV) blames promiscuous American gay tourists for bringing
this new mycoplasma to Africa, and for bringing back HIV.
He provides no evidence for this homophobic theory. Nor does
he mention the various mycoplasmas that were passed around
in the 1970s in scientific labs, and the fact that these microbes
were frequent contaminants in virus cultures and vaccines.
Why are all these
simultaneous introductions of new infectious agents into gay
men ignored by scientists? Surely a credible explanation would
be important in determining the origin of HIV and AIDS. Why
are scientists so opposed to the man-made theory? And why
do they believe so passionately in the chimp theory? One explanation
might be that scientists don't want the public to know what
happened to the tens of thousands of imported primates who
were held captive in laboratories throughout the world in
the decade before AIDS.
The forgotten
Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1977)
Rarely mentioned by AIDS scientists and media reporters
is the fact that surgeons have been transplanting chimpanzee
parts (and chimp viruses) into people for decades. When Keith
Reemtsma died in June 2000, at age 74, he was hailed as a
pioneer in cross-species organ transplants (now known as xenotransplantation).
By 1964, he had already placed six chimpanzee kidneys into
six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma
succeeded in many human-to-human organ transplants.
The largely forgotten
Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) is much more likely to
have spread primate (chimp and monkey) viruses to human beings.
This research program was responsible for the development,
production, seeding, and deployment of various animal cancer
and immunosuppressive AIDS-like viruses and retroviruses.
These laboratory-created viruses were capable of inducing
disease when transferred between animal species and also when
transplanted into human cells and tissue.
The SVCP began
in 1964 as a government-funded program of the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally designed
to study leukemia, the program was soon enlarged to study
all forms of cancer. The scope of the program was international
and included scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands,
Israel, and Africa. The mission of the SVCP was to collect
various human and animal cancers from around the world and
to grow large amounts of cancer-causing viruses. As a result,
thousands of liters of dangerous man-made viruses were adapted
to human cells and shipped around the world to various laboratories.
The annual reports of the SVCP contain proof that species
jumping of animal viruses was a common occurrence in labs
a decade before AIDS.
The SVCP gathered
together the nation's top virologists, biochemists, immunologists,
molecular biologists, and epidemiologists to determine the
role of viruses and retroviruses in the production of human
cancer. Many of the most prestigious medical institutions
were involved in this program.
Connected with
the SVCP were the most famous future American AIDS scientists,
such as Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Max Essex
of "cat AIDS" fame, and Peter Duesberg, who claims
HIV does not cause AIDS. Gallo and Essex were also the first
to promote the widely accepted African green monkey theory
of AIDS. This theory was proven erroneous as far back as 1988,
but was heavily circulated among AIDS educators and the media
until the theory was superseded by the chimp theory in the
late 1990s.
Biowarfare
and primate research
Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were
the military's biological warfare researchers. On October
18, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the army's
biowarfare laboratories at Fort Detrick, Maryland, would be
converted to cancer research. As part of Nixon's so-called
War on Cancer, the military biowarfare unit was retitled the
Frederick Cancer Research Center, and Litton Bionetics was
named as the military's prime contractor for this project.
According to the
1971 SVPC annual report, the primary task of the now jointly
connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research
Center was "the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing)
and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on
a continuing basis." Special attention was given to primate
viruses (the alleged African source of HIV) and "the
successful propagation of significant amounts of human candidate
viruses." Candidate viruses were animal or human viruses
that might cause human cancers.
For these cancer
experiments, a steady supply of research animals (monkeys,
chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary; and multiple breeding
colonies were established for the SVCP. Primates were shipped
in from West Africa and Asia for experimentation; and virus-infected
animals were shipped out to various labs worldwide.
By 1971, a total
of 2,274 primates had been inoculated at Bionetics Research
Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over 1000 of
these monkeys had already died or had been transferred to
other primate centers. Some animals were eventually released
back into the wild. By the early 1970s, experimenters had
transferred cancer-causing viruses into several species of
monkeys, and had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus
saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to the
new Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus that produced the "gay
cancer" of AIDS in 1979.
In order to induce
primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their
immune systems were deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation,
or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland
and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected
into newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals.
Some animals were injected with malaria to keep them chronically
sick and immunodepressed.
The U.S. is the
world's leading consumer of primates, and 55,000 are used
yearly in medical research. Primates (especially newborn and
baby chimpanzees) are the most favored lab animals because
they are similar biochemically and immunologically to human
beings. Humans share 98.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees.
Chimps were extensively used by SVCP because there would be
no official testing of "candidate" lab viruses on
humans.
In the decade
before AIDS, Robert Gallo was a project officer of a primate
study contracted by Bionetics that pumped cancerous human
tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkey viruses,
into newborn macaques (a small species of monkey that carries
a close relative of the KS virus). Recorded in the 1971 SVCP
report (NIH-71-2025), Gallo's project notes state: "Inasmuch
as tests for the biological activity of candidate human viruses
will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative
that another system be developed for these determinations,
and subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measures
of control. The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower
primates to man justifies utilization of these animals for
these purposes."
Researchers at
Bionetics injected human and animal cancer material into various
species of monkeys to determine the cancer effect. Newborn
and irradiated monkeys were injected with blood ("using
multiple sites and volumes as large as possible") taken
from various forms of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue
cultures infected with various animal viruses were inoculated
into primates. How many "new" and "emerging"
viruses were created and adapted to human tissue and to various
primates is not known.
Some primates
were released back into the wild carrying lab viruses with
them. The possible spread of these lab viruses to other animals
in the wild has been ignored by scientists searching for the
origin of HIV and its close relatives in African animals.
Cats were also
bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies. Germ-free colonies
of inbred mice were established. Mouse cancer viruses were
manipulated to produce resistant and non-resistant strains.
These adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human
gene replacement experiments. Such experiments utilized a
weakened strain of the mouse leukemia virus to infect and
"taxi-in" the missing genes to genetically-defective
human beings.
The birth of AIDS
By 1977, the SVCP came to an inglorious end. According to
Gallo, "Scientifically, the problem was that no one could
supply clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not
even a DNA virus, and most researchers refused to concede
that viruses played any role in human cancers. Politically,
the Virus Cancer Program was vulnerable because it attracted
a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce
dramatic, visible results."
Despite all this,
the SVCP was the birthplace of genetic engineering, molecular
biology, and the human genome project. More than any other
program, it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which
led to the vital understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive
retroviruses in humans. As the SVCP was winding down, thousands
of gay men were signing up as guinea pigs in government-sponsored
hepatitis B vaccine experiments in New York, Los Angeles,
and San Francisco. These same cities would soon become the
three primary epicenters for the new "gay-related immune
deficiency syndrome," later known as AIDS.
Two years after
the termination of the SCVP, the introduction of HIV into
gay men (along with a herpes virus and a mycoplasma) miraculously
revived retroviral research and made Gallo the most famous
scientist in the world.
Could virus-contaminated
hepatitis vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? In the early 1970s,
the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees. To this
day, some people are fearful about taking the hepatitis B
vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and
AIDS. Was HIV - along with KS and a new mycoplasma - introduced
into gays during vaccine trials on thousands of homosexuals
in Manhattan beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities
in 1980-1981?
As mentioned,
the first gay AIDS cases erupted in Manhattan a few months
after the gay experiment began at the New York Blood Center.
When a blood test for HIV became available in the mid-1980s,
the Center's stored gay blood specimens were reexamined. Most
astonishing is the statistically significant fact that 20%
of the gay men who volunteered for the hepatitis B experiment
in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 - a
year before the AIDS epidemic became "official"
in 1981. This signifies that Manhattan gays in 1980 had the
highest incidence of HIV anywhere in the world, including
Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV and AIDS. Epidemic
cases in Africa did not appear until 1982.
Although denied
by the AIDS establishment, a few researchers are convinced
that these vaccine experiments served as the vehicle through
which HIV was introduced into the gay population. My own extensive
research into the hepatitis B experiments is presented in
AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin
of the AIDS Epidemic [1988], and in Queer Blood: The
Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993]. These books also debunk
the preposterous "Patient Zero" story of 1987, which
claimed a promiscuous gay Canadian airline steward brought
AIDS to America. The highly implausible story was sensationalized
in the media and served to further obscure the origin of AIDS
in America and blame gay promiscuity. Even Montagnier is doubtful
that the U.S. epidemic could have developed from a single
patient.
Never mentioned
by proponents of the chimp theory is the fact that the New
York Blood Center established a chimp virus laboratory in
West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the
Liberian Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield,
Liberia, was to develop the hepatitis B vaccine in chimps.
A few years later this vaccine was inoculated into gays at
the Center.
Chimps were captured from various parts of West Africa and
brought to VILAB. Alfred Prince, Head of virology at the New
York Blood Center, has been the director of VILAB for the
past 25 years. The lab prides itself by releasing "rehabilitated"
chimps back into the wild.
Also closely allied
with "pre-AIDS" development of a hepatitis B vaccine
is the little publicized primate colony outside New York City
called LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and
Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York
area scientists with primates and primate parts for transplantation
and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated
with the New York University Medical Center, where the first
cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered
in 1979. Researchers at NYU Medical Center were also heavily
involved in the development of the experimental hepatitis
B vaccine used in gays; and the Medical Center received government
grants and contracts connected with biological warfare research
beginning in 1969, according to Leonard Horowitz, author of
Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola [1996].
Scientific
disinformation: the 1959 HIV-positive blood test from Africa
By predating HIV back to the 1930s, the chimp theory effectively
discredits the man-made theory of AIDS, which dates the introduction
of HIV to the late 1970s. Only time will tell whether the
chimp theory will hold up to further scientific scrutiny.
Conspiracy theorists
believe some wildly popular AIDS origin stories in the press
reek of scientific disinformation. One example is the Patient
Zero story. Another is the media blitz surrounding the English
sailor who supposedly contracted AIDS in 1959. This now disproved
story made worldwide headlines in 1990 and obviously served
to contradict the underground conspiracy theory (particularly
among African-Americans) that AIDS was man-made.
The New York
Times (July 24, 1990) declared: "The case also refutes
the widely publicized charges made by Soviet officials several
years ago that AIDS arose from a virus that had escaped from
a laboratory experiment that went awry or was a biological
warfare agent. The human retrovirus group to which the AIDS
virus belongs was unknown at the time. Nor did scientists
then have the genetic engineering techniques needed to create
a virus." Several years later, the case was discovered
to be not a case of AIDS because the sailor's tissue remains
were accidentally (or deliberately) contaminated with HIV.
In 1998, the media
alerted the public to further evidence that AIDS started in
Africa. The proof consisted of an old 1959 stored frozen blood
specimen discovered to be HIV-positive. Researchers claimed
the tiny amount of serum contained fragments of HIV "closely
related" to a virus found in three chimpanzees in the
African wild, and in the frozen remains of a chimp named Marilyn
discovered in a freezer at Fort Detrick.
The 1959 specimen
was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo.
His name and health status were not recorded. Details of the
history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the
"world's oldest HIV-positive blood sample") are
recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and
AIDS [1999], by journalist Edward Hooper, who theorizes
that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine
programs in the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine
was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the
ancestor virus of HIV.
When tested for
HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen
out of 700 stored frozen Congo bloods that tested positive
for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller
grant, the African sample was one of many sent to the University
of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing. The
sample had been included in a report, "Population Genetic
Studies," published in 1966. Around 1970, the remaining
672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta
for further genetic tests.
In 1985, the specimens
again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias,
a virologist and animal researcher associated with the Yerkes
Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along
with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in
sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982. Initially,
over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV
by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-positive tests were
later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations
at Emory, the specimens were shipped to Harvard University
in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex's
lab.
Three specimens
initially tested HIV-positive, but finally only the 1959 specimen
from the unidentified Bantu man was confirmed HIV-positive.
Around the time of these examinations, Essex's lab was unknowingly
contaminated with primate viruses.
In 1986, Essex
discovered a new "human" AIDS virus that later proved
to be a contaminating monkey virus. The source of the primate
virus traced back to a captive monkey at a primate center
in nearby Southborough, Massachusetts. This primate contamination
at his lab resulted in the erroneous green monkey theory,
heavily popularized by Gallo and the media.
Also unpublicized
is the little known fact that Gallo's lab at the National
Cancer Institute was plagued with contamination by primate
viruses. In 1975, Gallo reported a new human "HL-23"
virus that eventually proved to be three contaminating ape
primate viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and
baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how
these viruses contaminated his research.
In 1996, Hooper
convinced Nahmias to turn over the remaining 1959 specimen
to David Ho of Rockefeller University in Manhattan for PCR
testing. In 1996, Ho was named Time magazine's "Man of
the Year," at a time when few people had ever heard of
him. Ho is also the director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research
Center, affiliated with Rockefeller University since 1996.
The Diamond Center is also now connected with the New York
Blood Center, home of the gay vaccine experiments that gave
birth to AIDS.
Ho determined
that the tiny amount of the remaining specimen did not contain
live virus, nor was the complete virion of the virus present.
Instead, some fragments of the virus (about 15% of the total
genome) were tested and presented to the scientific world
as the oldest specimen of HIV in the world. Ho's PCR results
cannot be confirmed by independent investigators because the
1959 specimen is now totally used up.
When published
in the journal Nature on February 5, 1998 ("An African
HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and implications for the origin of
the epidemic"), Hooper's name appeared on the report,
along with Ho, Bette Korber, Nahmias, and others. The report
was heavily publicized as proof that HIV existed in the African
population in 1959.
Although there
are no HIV-positive tissue specimens from Africa from the
1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS either, Hooper
relies heavily on this 1959 test to support his theory that
HIV entered the African population via the polio vaccines
programs in the late 1950s. In The River, Hooper quickly dismisses
the claims of physician Robert Strecker, the first whistle-blower
of man-made AIDS, as well as the research in Horowitz's Emerging
Viruses, and in my own books, AIDS & The Doctors
of Death, and Queer Blood.
In condemning
AIDS biowarfare research, Hooper declares, "Sadly, supporters
of the Streckers have continued to peddle their ill-informed
and outdated versions of the myth, blaming variously the Soviets,
the CIA, the Germans, and the World Health Organization (WHO)
well into the nineties." He dismisses the hepatitis B
vaccine connection to AIDS by noting that only two of the
826 gay vaccinees had developed AIDS by 1983. Hooper ignores
the fact that by 1981 over 20% of the men in the trials were
HIV-positive and that by 1982, over 30% of the men were HIV-positive.
He dismisses the World Health Organization's African smallpox
vaccine connection by saying, "there is no reason for
either HIV or SIV [simian immunodeficiency virus] to be accidentally
present in the vaccine." Hooper fails to consider the
possibility that the vaccines could have been deliberately
contaminated with HIV. Hooper has been a United Nations official,
but no details of this are included in his book.
Despite his massive
research, Hooper seems na«ve about the continuing transfer
of viruses between various primate species at primate centers.
For example, in 1995 he interviewed Preston Marx at LEMSIP.
At that time Marx was a representative of David Ho's organization,
the Aaron Diamond Research Center.
Hooper writes:
I was shocked by the cavalier way in which tissues and sera
from one species had been introduced into other species,
long after the risks of cross-species transfer had been
highlighted by the SV40 [polio vaccine] debacle, and I was
astonished that survivors from troops that had been stricken
by mystery illnesses could have been casually sold to other
centers, for use in experiments there. Furthermore, this
apparent lack of monitoring and central control seemed to
be echoed in other fields, like xenotransplantation (the
transplanting of organ or cells from one species to another)
- and here, of course, the implications were even more frightening.
By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s,
Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignored
all those animal viruses that were placed into human tissue
in the 60s and 70s, and all those dangerous viral creations
that were genetically altered for cancer research, vaccine
research, and secret biological warfare.
The Chimp in the freezer at
Fort Detrick
On February 1, 1999, Lawrence K Altman, longtime physician-writer
for The New York Times, dutifully reported, "the
riddle of the origin of the AIDS virus has apparently been
solved." A team of researchers, headed by Beatrice Hahn
at the University of Alabama, had performed viral studies
on three chimps in the African wild and had also studied the
frozen remains of a chimp, discovered by accident in a freezer
at Fort Detrick. The chimp had tested positive for HIV in
1985. On the basis of all this research, Hahn declared that
a common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes)
was the animal source of the virus "most closely"
related to HIV.
In a media blitz,
U.S. government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral
"family tree" of primate viruses (which few people
could understand) to prove that HIV was genetically descended
from a chimp virus in the African bush. Molecular analysis
of virus genetic data, performed by Bette Korber and the supercomputer
Nirvana at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico,
indicated that HIV had jumped species from a chimp to a human
in Africa around the year 1930. (Los Alamos is the official
home of nuclear bomb-building, alleged Chinese spies, and
the laboratory which directed secret human radiation experiments
on unsuspecting civilians from the 1940s up to the beginning
of the AIDS epidemic.)
Beatrice Hahn
theorized that the epidemic started when a hunter cut himself
while butchering chimp meat and subsequently became infected.
Scientists readily accepted Hahn's notion that the AIDS virus
and its closest relatives jumped species from chimps to humans
on multiple occasions, thereby explaining the origin of the
three separate subtypes of HIV-1 (M, N, and O), as well as
HIV-2.
Chimps in West
Africa are hunted for food, as well as for medical experimentation.
Young chimps are especially prized for scientific research
and are usually caught by shooting their mothers. Many die
from stress and inhumane conditions during capture and transport
to laboratories and zoos in Western nations. Due to all this
killing, chimps are now an endangered species. During the
past century the African chimp population has dropped from
two million to less than 150,000. Despite the mass killing
of chimps, they are still blamed for causing the worldwide
epidemic of AIDS.
Beatrice Hahn
is no stranger to primate theories, having worked in Gallo's
lab when he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory
in the mid-1980s and the "close relationship" of
the monkey virus to HIV. Now Hahn's virus was claimed to be
a closer relative than the contaminating monkey virus in Essex's
lab that formed the basis of the false green monkey theory.
Media journalists paid no attention to these discrepancies.
Hahn's new chimp findings, along with the old 1959 blood specimen,
fully convinced the AIDS establishment and an adoring media
that Africa was indeed the source of HIV and the AIDS epidemic.
The 2000 London Origin of AIDS
Conference
When Hooper's book appeared in the fall of 1998, molecular
scientists quickly used the new chimp virus data to completely
discredit Hooper's polio vaccine theory. AIDS in Africa could
not be caused by a virus jumping species in the 50s if it
had already jumped species back in the 1930s. Researchers
refused to believe scientists could have played any role in
the origin of HIV and AIDS.
Hooper bypassed
the biowarfare theory by predating HIV back to the 50s. Now
scientists bypassed Hooper by dating HIV back several decades
earlier. The fact that there was no African epidemic until
the early 1980s did not seem pertinent. To make their view
official, a small group of scientists proposed an "invitation
only" meeting to settle the origin matter once and for
all.
In October 2000,
the Royal Society of London held a two-day conference on the
origins of HIV. Obviously, the biowarfare theory of AIDS was
not discussed. On the contrary, one professor emphatically
declared "all human infectious diseases have an animal
origin." Although there never was a disease like AIDS
- until scientists started to flagrantly pass viruses around
to repeatedly break the species barrier, the same professor
declared that "natural transfer of these infections is
a common event in animal populations."
Using the viral
fragments from the 1959 specimen and comparing them with the
select viruses contained in the data bank at Los Alamos, Betty
Korber refined her computer calculations to establish a likely
date of 1940, "with confidence levels extending from
1871 to 1955." The Rega Institute in Antwerp estimated
the transfer could have occurred between 1590 and 1760, with
1675 the most likely date.
Hooper spoke,
but his views were largely ignored by the molecular biologists.
Preston Marx warned about more human diseases caused by viruses
emerging from primates. None of the speakers mentioned what
happened to the thousands of liters of animal viruses that
were passed around the world by the Special Virus Cancer Program
in the decade before AIDS.
Instead, the London
conferees alerted the public to a new view of medical science,
championed by the virologists. The "Last Word" at
the conference was that "all human viral infections were
initially zoonotic (animal) in origin. Animals will always
provide a reservoir for viruses that could threaten human
populations in the future." And the scientists predicted:
"There is still a myriad of current unknown viruses in
animal populations on land, sea, and air with the potential
to cause human disease." Apparently, none of these viruses
were present in animal laboratories.
AIDS, cancer and genetic science
Although rejected completely by most scientists, the man-made
theory of AIDS is a rational explanation for the origin of
HIV, based on an awareness of the gene-polluting activities
and species-jumping virus experiments of irresponsible scientists
during the two decades before the epidemic. In addition, the
record clearly shows that scientists and biowarfare scientists
experiment secretly on unsuspecting people. Horrific aspects
of the Cold War Human Radiation Experiments attest to the
fact that covert medical experimentation is not an "X-Files"
fantasy.
It is easy to
understand why researchers might want to obscure the man-made
origin for AIDS and blame primates. It is now apparent that
most of the major researchers promoting the African primate
origin of AIDS were connected with the largely secret Special
Virus Cancer Program, or are scientists involved in the transfer
of viruses in animal research, particularly primate research.
From the very
beginning of the epidemic, researchers disclaimed any connection
between AIDS and cancer, as well as any connection between
HIV and animal retrovirus cancer research. In 1984, Gallo
originally named HIV a cancer-causing "leukemia/lymphoma"
virus. To obscure the cancer connection, the name was immediately
changed to "lymphotropic" virus.
My own Kaposi's
sarcoma research, first published in medical journals in 1981,
showed "cancer-associated bacteria" as possible
infectious agents in "classic" KS tumors. Before
HIV was discovered in 1984, additional papers in 1982 and
1983 showed similar cancer bacteria in the enlarged lymph
nodes and KS tumors of gay men with "gay cancer"
and AIDS. Since the 1950s, cancer-associated bacteria have
been linked to viruses, as well as to mycoplasmas. This aspect
of cancer research has been suppressed for decades by the
cancer establishment. A history of this research and its relevancy
to AIDS is the subject of my books, AIDS: The Mystery and
the Solution [1984] and The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden
Killer in Cancer, AIDS and Other Immune Diseases [1990].
Gallo, in his
1991 book, falsely claims that no infectious agent had ever
been found in KS. The refusal of AIDS scientists to recognize
cancer microbe research, published in peer reviewed scientific
journals, is a further indication that the AIDS establishment
seeks to control all aspects of HIV research in such a way
as to never connect the origin of AIDS with early cancer research
and covert biological warfare research. This cover-up conceals
the possibility that AIDS, in reality, is a new man-made form
of infectious and contagious cancer.
Could a small
coterie of government scientists concoct a bogus (but scientifically
plausible) primate theory of AIDS origin and bamboozle the
public to believe it in order to cover up the truth? It is
time for the man-made theory of HIV to be examined fairly.
Proponents of this theory should not be dismissed as paranoid
conspiracy theorists; and AIDS educators should educate themselves
about this hidden history of AIDS and its implications for
the origin of HIV.
How many more species jumping viruses will we have to endure
before we question the integrity and the agenda of scientists
who still blissfully jump viruses between species in animal
laboratories?
The secrecy and
scientific disinformation surrounding the Human Radiation
Experiments of the Cold War era has taught us how easily government
scientists can fool the public on scientific matters. And
when it comes to scientific monkey business, researchers know
that most people are chumps.
©2001
Dr. Alan Cantwell.
Dr.
Cantwell is a retired dermatologist and AIDS and cancer researcher,
who has written extensively on the man-made origin of AIDS.
E-mail
address: alanrcan@aol.com.
Dr.
Cantwell's books are available from Book Clearing House: 1-800-431-1579,
and at amazon.com.
References
Cantwell
Jr., A: Bacteriologic investigation and histologic observations
of variably acid-fact bacteria in three cases of Kaposi's
sarcoma. Growth 45: 79-89, 1981; Necroscopic findings of pleomorphic,
variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal case of Kaposi's sarcoma.
Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology 7: 923-930, 1981;
Variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in a case of reactive
lymph node hyperplasia occurring in a young male homosexual.
Growth 46: 331-336, 1982; Kaposi's sarcoma and variably acid-fast
bacteria in vivo in two homosexual men. Cutis 32: 58-74, 1983;
Necroscopic findings of variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal
case of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and Kaposi's sarcoma.
Growth 47: 129-134, 1983.
Cantwell
Jr., A: AIDS: The Mystery & the Solution. Los Angeles:
Aries Rising, 1984; AIDS & The Doctors of Death: An Inquiry
into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic. Aries Rising, 1988;
The Cancer Microbe. Aries Rising, 1990; Queer Blood: The Secret
AIDS Genocide Plot. Aries Rising, 1993.
Cantwell
Jr, A: "Gay cancer, emerging viruses, and AIDS."
New Dawn (Melbourne), Sept 1998.
Faden RR (Chair): "The Human Radiation Experiments: Final
Report of the President's Advisory Committee." New York:
Oxford University Press, 1996.
Gallo
R: Virus Hunting: AIDS, Cancer and the Human Retrovirus. New
York: Basic Books, 1991.
Hooper E: The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS.
Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1999.
Horowitz
LG: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Rockport, MA: Tetrahedron
Publishing Group, 1996.
Lee RE: AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time-Bomb? Biographical
Publishing Company, Prospect, CT, 2000.
Montagnier
L: Virus. New York: WW Norton Co, Inc, 2000.
Special
Virus Cancer Program (Progress Report #8). Bethesda, MD: National
Institutes of Health, August 1971.
|