Home / ARTICLES / FOREVER 21: NEW AMERICAN AGENDA
FOREVER-21

FOREVER 21: NEW AMERICAN AGENDA

by Clyde Lewis, Ground Zero

It is a fact that if anyone decides that they want to do any investigative research on Agenda 21 they will find that many environmentalist websites tend to report how it is a stupid conspiracy theory and that the notion that there will be a jackbooted green police waiting to take your property is just outrageous.

One particular website that jeers the conspiracy theories is Slate, providing an article from a website called “One Earth” in their article, ‘Agenda 21: No, The Government isn’t Going to Confiscate Your Property‘.

In its opening paragraph we read:

Pssst! Have you heard about Agenda 21? The secret plot to collectivize private property—hatched by United Nations internationalists and midwifed by operatives ensconced within our own government—all in the name of “ending sprawl” and “encouraging sustainability”? The seizure of suburban homes by jackbooted, gun-toting U.N. thugs? The involuntary relocation of displaced suburbanites to cramped dwellings in densely packed cities?

No? Seriously? You haven’t heard about any of this?

It goes on to make fun of people who have been warning Americans that there is a plot by the government to seize property and to move American citizens into the big cities. It cites the ‘black helicopter crowd‘ as being paranoid and that the “green helmets” won’t be seizing property anytime soon and that the conspiracy theorists claim that it is part of a secret plot to rid the planet of human beings in order to achieve global sustainability.

The article that was published by Jeff Turrentine is a smear and shaming piece that redeems the “Future Earth” fanatics and marginalizes those who worry that they may become refugees in their own country if the feds or even the United Nations decide to take property rights away from the United States citizens.

The article was written a long time before we knew who Cliven Bundy was or before Harry Reid compared the actions of the militias at the Bunkerville Ranch with the Boston Marathon bombers and before the actions of Frazier Glen Miller, a known neo-Nazi that went on a shooting spree at a Jewish center in Kansas City.

Back in July of 2011 I reported that the UN was proposing the idea of creating an environmental security force, known as the “green helmets” to intervene in conflicts caused by resource depletion in rural and remote regions of the world. The green helmets will be a “green” or environmental police that will enforce resource distribution in countries where food, water and other resources are scarce.

Now, the media has been buzzing about what has been happening with Cliven Bundy, and yet there are many stories about how the military an or the federal government have forced citizens out of their homes without giving them dime one of compensation for their inconvenience. One example is the CANAMEX highway that was being planned for an area of Arizona 70 miles southeast of Phoenix.

In writing about North American trade corridors, CallToDecision.com notes:

Canamex is a planned four-lane highway extending from Mexico City to Edmonton, Alberta, in Canada. The project has recently received the support of a certain number of states and provinces including Arizona, Sonora and Alberta. The Canadian Government is providing financial support for the building of the North South Trade Corridor in Alberta, the Canadian section of Canamex. The U.S. Congress has designated the completion of Canamex as a high priority in the American road system. Canamex currently uses Highway I-15 in the United States. The external relations secretariat of Mexico has taken on the promotion of the project.

Now, Dave Hodges has reported that the CANAMEX highway is an Agenda 21 project and that I-15 runs adjacent to the Bundy property. Now say what you will about Chinese solar farm interests, Harry Reid and his son Rory – but the CANAMEX corridor is a vital project for the so called North American Union and The Chinese control of both new energy sources and even Military installations near these proposed

Hodges reports in his article, ‘The Bundy Affair Is The Tip of The Iceberg To What’s Coming‘:

It is time to connect the dots on one leg of this land grab in Nevada. The I-15 Canamex Highway runs adjacent to the planned theft of the Bundy property. In this location, a new Agenda 21 land designation is emerging and it is called a “Solar Energy Zone”. Solar Energy Zones will connect the variables of the Canamex, the evisceration of private property rights, land use delineated in the Agenda 21 Wildlands, the control of all transportation corridors within the United States and the ultimate betrayal, the Chinese control of all military bases in the United States.

How do I know this? First, I have lived through the same resource theft, property rights grab with the Canamex. Additionally, in Arizona, we are also establishing a solar farm system that has all the hallmark traits of what is going on at the Bundy property. The Arizona state government is cooperating with various federal agencies to build a massive solar farm 70 miles southwest of Phoenix. The Arizona solar project is located adjacent to Luke AFB flight operations and it is near another energy resource, the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant.

He also reports that 300 homeowners were asked to leave their homes because the government needed water in order to operate the CANAMEX international multimodal hub. They could not have 300 residents in a rural area put a drain on the reservoir that was nearby. John McCain convinced local politicians to legislate against the residents that lived near the Arizona hub and stripped them of all their property rights in an attempt to force them out over a period of time without compensating them for the loss of their homes.

This puts a lot of what is happening with the Nevada land grab into perspective.

If you want to read about proposed Agenda 21 ‘energy zones’, the Bureau of Land Management has produced this dated March of 2014:

http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/blm_library/tech_notes.Par.29872.File.dat/TN_444.pdf

According to the introduction:

“In 2012, the BLM and the U.S. Department of Energy published the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States,” the report reads. “The Final Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement assessed the impact of utility-scale solar energy development on public lands in the six southwestern states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.”

“The Approved Resource Management Plan Amendments/Record of Decision (ROD) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States implemented a comprehensive solar energy program for public lands in those states and incorporated land use allocations and programmatic and SEZ-specific design features into land use plans in the six-state study area.”

Also, B. Christopher Agee reports in his article, ‘Obama Accused By Congressman Of Illegal Action At Bundy Ranch‘:

After the federal Bureau of Land Management agents backed down from their intimidating stance at the Bundy Ranch last weekend, ample evidence has surfaced indicating the standoff between the government and the Nevada ranching family is far from over. Throughout the weeklong stalemate, members of the Bundy family were physically assaulted by armed officers, numerous cows were shot dead, and protesters faced threats of gunfire for merely expressing their outrage.

As far as I can see, no agent of the BLM was harmed in the incident.

In response, Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman sent a letter to Barack Obama, Department of the Interior Sec. Sally Jewell, and BLM Director Neil Kornze, laying out his position that any such action by the agency would violate the U.S. Constitution.

Here are the letters:

Letter page 1

Letter Page 2

I got in touch with Deborah Tavarez after she returned from the Bundy ranch and she related to me that what we are seeing with the Bundy standoff and what we will see with future standoffs and run-ins is an effort by pundits of “Future Earth” and Agenda 21 with the aid of the banks and corrupt politicians to push for different ‘forbidden zones‘ all over the United States.

If you want to be enlightened you may want to check out an article published on Forbes called “Earth’s Future Forbidden Zones” where UN planners intend to restrict your lifestyle to postpone the supposed coming environmental apocalypse.

Many of the global sustainability fear mongers have been pushing the agenda that the world is doomed and that they have the answers to combat or avoid an ‘extinction level event‘.

The concept of ‘Earth’s Future Forbidden Zones‘ is not new. Agenda 21 has been championing a similar concept that they claim is there to protect the planet from the people. While many people believe that the United Nations Agenda 21 ‘sustainable development’ plan, is plan to cull the populace for sustainable development, there is more to it than just the elimination of useless eaters. It is also a plan to control all land use for full-spectrum control.

The statistics of land ownership and the ability for the BLM to create forbidden zones will most certainly create more Bundy ranch-type stand-offs in the future.

As Inquisitr.com reports, “The BLM (Bureau of Land Management) wields power over about 460 million acres of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States of America.

Percent of land in western states under BLM public lands management:

Nevada 84.5 percent

Utah 57.4 percent

Oregon 53.1 percent

Idaho 50.2 percent

Arizona 48.1 percent

Wyoming 42.4 percent

California 45.3 percent

Colorado 36.6 percent

New Mexico 41.8 percent

fedland

Those in the camp of “global sustainability” believe that people are not good stewards of their own land and that the government will do a better job of land management if they have control of property. The right of the individual or of the sovereign no longer applies, according the ‘Future Earth’ planners. Individual rights and individual property rights will give way to the needs of the community and, in some cases, the needs of the military industrial complex.

Programs like the Wildlands Project are programs that indicate that most of the land should be set aside for non-humans.

As ActivistPost.com informs, “The Wildlands Project came out of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity the year before Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 U.N. Rio Summit.

Sustainability encompasses all things environmental – including global warming, climate change and alternative energy.

The fear mongering that has been created by ‘Future Earth’ planners is actually an apocalyptic blueprint that sets that timetable between now and 2050.

The ‘Future Earth’ proposal explains that the population is exploding, wild species are endangered, the environment is degrading and the costs of resources from oil and water will be going up.

Therefore it is believed that the government has the wisdom to use the land to benefit future generations.

In the Club of Rome’s published document, “The First Global Revolution,” it states:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples… All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/TheFirstGlobalRevolution_text.pdf

I think this summarizes why Harry Reid made the outrageous claim that those who defended the Bundy ranch were “domestic terrorists.”

In a war for sustainability, ‘we the people’ are the enemy if we stand in the way of their “Future Earth” agendas.

As the global planners hook you with “climate change” and the socially engineered “saving the planet from the environmental cataclysmic model,” we could very well see in the future an urgency to justify laws requiring people to be forced from their homes and lands because of some trumped up crisis that needs to be averted.

Tariq Banuri, the director of the U.N.’s Division for Sustainable Development, says: “Agenda 21 is not a binding treaty. It sets out a sort of common vision.

However, the common vision is for the elites and not the average American. The common vision they speak of will be implemented through patterns of force, coercion, intimidation, and deadly force.

‘Future Earth’ planning is the idea of implementing Agenda 21 forever. For some it will be the new American agenda, for others it will be the jackboot knocking on your door with back up artillery, forcing you out of your home, making you a refugee on your own planet.

by Clyde Lewis, Ground Zero It is a fact that if anyone decides that they want to do any investigative research on Agenda 21 they will find that many environmentalist websites tend to report how it is a stupid conspiracy theory and that the notion that there will be a jackbooted green police waiting to take your property is just outrageous. One particular website that jeers the conspiracy theories is Slate, providing an article from a website called “One Earth” in their article, ‘Agenda 21: No, The Government isn’t Going to Confiscate Your Property‘. In its opening paragraph we read:…

Review Overview

User Rating: Be the first one !
0

One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookCheck Our Feed